Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Glen E. Page - The Last Plague (book review)


"The Last Plague" (Amazon: US, UK)
by Glen E. Page
Format: Paperback, 448 pages
Publisher: Synergy Books
-
-
A young girl is brought into Dr. Douglas Hunter's ER one night with her abdomen ripped open. One of her ovaries has been stolen; the other is as hard and black as coal. When the bodies of more young girls are discovered, their ovaries also missing, Dr. Hunter and his family of adopted misfits find themselves unwittingly drawn into a dark plot of government intrigue and biblical prophecy. As Dr. Hunter investigates the cause behind this mysterious plague, he and his family uncover unsettling connections, not only between their own painful pasts, but to war crimes in Nazi germany and even events from the days of Christ. The investigation attracts the attention of a group of ruthless people with mysterious powers who are determined to keep the plague a secret. But as more secrets come to light, Dr. Hunter realizes his family may be facing the last plague, the beginnings of the Apocalypse.

-
-
I've already mentioned a few times that I like post-apocalyptic fiction. That was one of the main reasons, if not the main reason, why I accepted to review “The Last Plague”. To be honest, I thought it could be a great book when I first saw it – a nice enough cover (not as ‘suspicious’ as, let's say, "Unholy Domain”) and although the killer-plague idea itself has been done to death, it does not necessarily mean that the book is completely unoriginal. I like to read about plagues. Too bad it turned out that “The Last Plague” has (almost) nothing to do with a plague whatsoever.

When I turned the first page, I already found myself fully engaged in a certain happening. Wait, what? I checked the cover again to make sure that it was really the first book in the series. It was. For the next couple of chapters nothing changes, everything’s a total mess. It’s true that sometimes, it’s good to plunge into the middle of action right away, but I rather see that the book starts ‘slow and easy’, keeping things more or less clear and straightforward. I doubt that any reader likes to be (and stay) confused from the beginning on, having absolutely no idea what’s going on and who is who. For me, at least, it was damn annoying. I kept mixing the names of the demons and the doctors, and when I somehow managed to sort out the names of the former, the latter remained a bunch of unconnected names right up until enough of them died that I could distinguish between the ones that remain. I believe that the editor of “The Last Plague” could do much to improve this (especially in the beginning); it seems to me as though some parts were just skipped where editing is concerned. Sometimes, names are being needlessly repeated over and over again, even the sentences seem identical and piled one over the other (see the below example).
"Hey Indian, ever hear of pheromones?"
"Nah," Indian answered, but Indian's gaze just caught sight of something else in the distance.

(...)

Cautiously she walked down the hall to the staircase. Hurriedly she climbed the steps to the empty surgical suites one floor above. Gently she opened the double doors leading to one of the suites.
But the main problem of the book is that there are great many characters trying to do great many things. The good guys being two doctors, their friends and families (including a number of people who used to work with the army intelligence, a Native American named Indian (but of course) who is literally a killing machine, one Mexican – once upon a time a monk – everybody laughs at, a supposedly dead wife, and two kids: a boy – the 'chosen one' - and an African girl that carries the plague), Mountain People who are rarely, if ever, seen, a guy that can heal with the touch of his hands, a guy who claims to be one of the 11 Apostles, and a group of Jewish people (I’m not really certain what their role is, but they are involved nonetheless).
I’m pretty sure there is an Asian or two I’ve somehow managed to miss. Where’s the point of skipping them, if you’ve included all of the other races?

The bad guys are a bit simpler to discern: they seem to represent every single person with authority (except for one sheriff) that the good guys manage to encounter. The most notable among them are the military and a certain cult, whose members believe to be Lucifer’s adopted children. The latter group contains those that infected humanity with a virus that causes ovaries to blacken. The leaders of this cult is someone named Niac (later in the book a ‘shocking’ detail is revealed: his true name, in fact, is Cain). There is not much of actual fighting between the good and the bad; the good are mostly fleeing, trying to survive and to figure out what the virus that causes black ovaries really is. And, of course, the good and the bad are so tightly intertwined that you can’t be really certain who is working with whom (and the fact that some of the people change their mind somewhere in the middle of the book doesn’t help much). Once again, it is a complete mess.

Wait! Did I mention that the good guys are in fact chosen by God? Somewhere in the last part of the book, everything shifts from a simple ‘run away, they’re trying to kill us’ gig to a sanctimonious mission. Maybe it’s just me, but I’m not overly fond of books that are trying to convince me that God exists, and that He has a Plan. If the author convenes religious beliefs in inoffensive and unobtrusive manner (King did this in “The Stand” and it was perfectly digestible) or turn it in a underlying message, that's perfectly fine with me - but don’t drop it fervently right on top of my head. Just for example, I loved “The Book of Joby” (even if by that time I didn’t know that Book of Job really is about a bet between the God and the Devil – but that only made me love "The Book of Joby" more after I found out); those of you who read it know that there is a lot of religious content included. I usually don’t mind this, as long as it doesn’t take on a persuasive note, and that, unfortunately, is exactly what “The Last Plague” did.

As said, there is hardly any mention of an actual plague. There is some speculation about the origins of 'the black ovaries' virus, but the good guys are too preoccupied with surviving – miraculously, might I add – to give much thought to why-s, where-s and how-s. I couldn’t really discern much signs of apocalypse, but there is a lot of talk about military secrets and army intelligence and so on, and that brings to a fact that “The Last Plague” is more of a thriller than anything else. But even so, it’s a badly written one. There is practically nothing to draw the reader to read on or to make him care for the characters, but the flaws regarding style or plot are present aplenty, luring you to put the book down.

The only thing that saves “The Last Plague” from being an utterly unreadable drivel are the parts of the book where nothing “extraordinary” is happening (e.g. when a whole family gets down to take a dinner) and much of it is based on dialogue and humor. These parts are actually quite good. The humor can be pretty wicked sometimes – maybe I’m sick, but I laughed my guts out at the dead guy joke. But sadly, that’s just about it. When the talking is over, it is usually followed by a tiresome, annoying and in most cases a confusing situation. If it wasn’t for the laughs, the time spent reading “The Last Plague” would be surmised as completely and utterly wasted.
-
-
-
-
-
~ Trin ~

Saturday, July 19, 2008

Dan Ronco - Unholy Domain (Book Review)


"Unholy Domain" (Amazon: UK, US)
by Dan Ronco
Format: Hardcover, 352 pages
Publisher: Künati Inc.

-

A lethal computer virus roars across the Internet; more than a million people die before it is terminated. A decade later, civilisation has crumbled in an economic collapse. The world is divided between those who think technology will save them and those who believe it to be the tool of Satan. David Brown, son of the virus' creator, believes his father innocent and sets out to clear his name - but his efforts make him a target for both sides, the fanatics and the technos ...

***

At first, I was a bit skeptic about the book. An author I've never heard of, an unknown publisher and a crucifix on the cover - it all made the "Unholy Domain" seem a bit suspicious. The blurb on the back, however, was promising, and so I gave the book a go.

***

"It reads like a cross between Blade Runner and Angels and Demons."
-R.Douglas Weber
***

To begin with, I must say that there is actually some truth in the book praise section. These are usually more or less similar, comparing the book at hand to the work of one or another famous author, and more than often the two have nothing in common. Comparing Ronco to Dick falls in the above section, but the comparison to Dan Brown hits the proverbial spot. I say 'almost' because Ronco is ... well, better, at least from what I've seen. I've read my share of Dan Brown novels and they could just as well be one and the same, sharing a predictable plot, unavoidable romance and a style that falters from time to time. While Ronco sometimes repeats some of Dan Brown's mistakes, he more often than not manages to avoid them, creating an easy, fast-paced SF thriller I enjoyed very much.

As said, there were some things that bothered me, but none spoiled the reading experience much. "Unholy Domain" can be very predictable at times - for example, it's all to easy to guess what fate befell David's father. There are other, similar occasions, when the reader can get ahead of the plot, and the most that the book got from me was a mild surprise. There is also a girl who's an obvious seducer, charming the main character in a heart-beat; a cliché if there ever was one and it doesn't really matter whether she's a good or a bad 'guy'. To his credit, Ronco pulled out the best of that one, not lingering on it and making her an 'in-between', neither good or bad. I was also glad that the romance was not playing an important part in the story - the girl stayed more or less out of the way of main plot.

Otherwise, the plot flows smoothly, including many POVs, and though it is set in the near-future, is light on inclusion of futuristic gadgetry, so there is no unnecessary info-dumping concerning technology. The style of writing is good, though a bit biased at the beginning, where the author appears to be too clearly on the side of the Technos (this evens out later on), including 'prayers' of Army of God which are not really as subtle as prayers about killing your enemies should be and therefore make a rather silly impression. Also, the ending itself surprised me, mostly because there is none. Uncle Google then informed me that "Unholy Domain" is in truth the second book of a trilogy starting with "Peacemaker" and ending with "Tomorrow's Children", the latter to be published in spring of 2009. Huh. If it wasn't for a missing ending, I'd never figure that out.

To sum it all up: "Unholy Domain" is for the most part an average thriller, but nevertheless a highly enjoyable read. I can't say it's a very memorable book, but it surely is great as a summer read.
-
-
-
-
-
~ Trin ~

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Scott Bakker - Neuropath (Book Preview)

-
-
---Scott Bakker, author of the much lauded fantasy trilogy "Prince of Nothing", will be releasing the anticipated psychological thriller "Neuropath" on May 15 (Amazon release date for UK). Pat's Fantasy Hotlist gave the book an excellent review. As from now on, you can also read the first chapter online for free here (a fantasybookspot.com exclusive feature), so you can decide for yourself if you might enjoy it or not. But let me warn you that the novel is described (by Pat) as "a disturbing venture into the mind of a raving psychopath...who in some ways surpasses even the great Hannibal Lecter himself". It's supposed to be gritty, realistic and very smartly written. If you've read "Prince of Nothig" than you know what to expect - an utterly deranged and/or tormented cast of characters.

 

blogger templates 3 columns | Make Money Online